Break Out of Dilemma:Russia in 2015　　　　CICIR Research group 

　　In 2015, international situation is turbulent, the world economy, especially emerging economies recovered overall weakly. Russia got into trouble. Economically, multiple factors, including the western extension of its sanctions against Russia and continuing oil low price, pushed Russian economy into deep recession. Diplomatically, the relations between Russia and the West dropped to freezing point due to the Ukrainian Crisis, the Eurasian Union got off to a bad start, the international dilemma facing Russia didn't not get rid of. In the context of difficulties, Russia manage to get diplomatic breakthrough. At home, situation is overall stable with looming worries. Although complicated international and regional situation, Sino-Russian relations continued to develop steadily, the comprehensive strategic partnership of coordination further to consolidate.

　　Review of Putinism　　　　Pang Dapeng 

　　According to content and the driving force of historical development, after 24 years of the collapse of the Soviet Union, Russia development can be divided into two periods: Yeltsin and Putin periods. Putin's governance concepts and measures have been referred to as “Putinism”. Putinism caused debate about these questions such as Russian state governance and development path in both the West and Russia. Two sides gave different interpretation of Putinism. Putinism has clear internal logic and remains connected with history of the Russian state characteristics and traditions of state governance. Putinism connotation can be summarized as control of politics, political nature of economy, and extensionality of diplomacy. The essence of it that Putin wants to make strategic adjustment and adaptation for solving the needs of the transformation and development in Russia after the collapse of the Soviet Union. This concept has a far-reaching influence on the world situation and Russian development.

　　Russia's Isolationism：Ideology and Historical Mentality　　　　Zhang Haoqi 

　　Under the background of the large expansion of the Russian empire, the Russian traditional isolationism is not so much a foreign policy or a foreign strategy, as an ideology. Its foundation is to keep going with the different development road from European one. Isolationism hasn't keep Russia out of the European affairs, but it determines the Russian participation and constant pursuit of leading European international system, and determines its relationship with the European international system for a long time in the midst of an antagonistic strain. The specific conditions of Russian isolationism and historical experience, especially experience of the Soviet Union period, shaped the contemporary Russian elite's self-sufficient “Russian island” psychology, and deeply influenced the Russian understanding of themselves and the outside world. After the collapse of the Soviet Union, Russian integration into Europe finished without fruits, isolationist sentiments have kept increasing. But in today's globalization background, the isolationism is not the way to go.

　　Review of Russian Renationalization　　　　Guo Xiaoqiong 

　　Under the influence ofdrastic transformation and “curse of natural resources” there is an obvious trend of deindustrialization in Russia. However, Russian de-industrialization is different from that of developed industrialized countries. Meanwhile, it determines that Russia takes different road in industrialization from that of developed countries. From this angel of point, this paper analyses the characteristics of the Russian de-industrialisation, its incentive and main performance. At the same time the paper presents the characters and main policies and measures of Russia's re- industrialization and predicts the future development trend.

　　Political and Economic Logic of Property Right: Evidence from Russia's Law of Bankruptcy　　　　Zhang Xin 

　　As the end of themass privatization in the early 1990s, Russia's main market participants' political preferences for property right system have taken place significant change. Yesterday's state-owned assets grabbers quickly transformed into today's most powerful defender of private property right. This laid down the social foundation for a healthy private property right system of capitalism. The political and economic process introduced by three bankruptcy laws, adopted in 1992, 1998 and 2002 respectively, showed that after mass privatization even if all individuals become owners of private assets, even if all people (including the representative of the interests of the state) agree to protect private property rights of abstract goals, their demand for specific bankruptcy system still have important differences in multiple dimensions, and the corresponding political struggle is normal in constructing market system, in the context of contemporary Russia “ the end of primitive accumulation” does not terminate.

　　Political Logic and Crisis of Political Development in Central Asian States　　　　Bao Yi 

　　Political development of Central Asian states is a process of national construction and political system modernization. In this process, all countries should not only make de-Sovietization of the power structure system and realize the nationalization of power, but also coordinate the relations between centralization and localization of nation-state building, and make the secularization of regime. For more than 20 years of independence and transformation, five Central Asian countries have constructed power structure and the political system on the basis of the principle of separation of powers system. Due to the most Central Asian countries hasn't experienced regular rotation of presidency, their constitutional democratic systems haven't been consolidated. Therefore, although the Presidents of these countries have unbeatable political prestige, but as leaders are getting “old” , structural and institutional contradictions of political power system increasingly highlight, and likely pose a real threat to political stability in “post-old man ruling” time.

　　Political Logic of Youth Political Organization under the Shock of the Colour Revolution　　　　Song Bo 

　　Since the collapse of the Soviet Union, the Color Revolution gradually became the main factors that impact the political landscape in CIS countries. And youth political organizations are the main challengers against the wave of this kind of political shock. But the color-revolution styled political impact can't be realized in every country where is happened. The reasons for that are that the country in question has taken different management logic for youth political organization. Therefore management of youth political organization became the key factor to withstand color revolution. Using case comparison and analysis method, the author selects three typical countries (Georgia, Russia and Ukraine) to compare each other. Analysis found that governance, by government, of youth political organization mainly based on two logics of participation or inhibition mobilization. Different governance logic leads to different result of containing a color revolution impact. At the same time, along with the changes of political transition, countries with existing effective governance logic also encounter challenges.